Function not implemented using dx_recwav HMP 4.1

rated by 0 users
This post has 1 Reply | 1 Follower

Not Ranked
Posts 6
Points 120
sunone Posted: 02-06-2010 2:15 AM

Hello,

I am using HMP 4.1 SU 18 running on Redhat 5.3

I am trying to record a wave file. However, the dx_recwav return an error "Function not implemented" Does this mean I cannot use this function on HMP 4.1 processing software?

Is my code incorrect?

Many thanks for any advice

static int32_t g_dx_recwav(const uint32_t port_num)

{

    DV_TPT tpt;

    DX_XPB xpb;

 

    /* Open voice channel */

    if((port[port_num].chdev = dx_open("dxxxB1C1", 0)) == -1)

    {

        log_msg(stderr, "dx_open [ %s ] [ %d ]\n", __func__, __LINE__);

 

        return GC_FAILURE;

    }

 

    /* Clear the structure */

    dx_clrtpt(&tpt, 1);

    tpt.tp_type = IO_EOT;

    tpt.tp_termno = DX_MAXDTMF;

    tpt.tp_length = 1;

    tpt.tp_flags = TF_MAXDTMF;

 

    /* Specify file format */

    xpb.wFileFormat = FILE_FORMAT_WAVE;

    xpb.wDataFormat = DATA_FORMAT_PCM;

    xpb.nSamplesPerSec = DRT_8KHZ;

    xpb.wBitsPerSample = 16;

 

    /* Start recording */

    if(dx_recwav(port[port_num].chdev, "rec_test.wav", &tpt, &xpb, PM_TONE | EV_SYNC) == -1)

    {

        log_msg(stderr, "dx_recwav() reason: [ %s ] last err: [ %d ] function: [ %s ] line: [ %d ]\n",

                ATDV_ERRMSGP(port[port_num].chdev), ATDV_LASTERR(port[port_num].chdev), __func__, __LINE__);

        return GC_FAILURE;

    }        

    return GC_SUCCESS;

}

  • Filed under:
  • | Post Points: 20
Top 10 Contributor
Posts 291
Points 2,760

That's interesting because it is listed in the Voice Library guide:

http://www.dialogic.com/manuals/docs/voice_api_hmp_v6.pdf

Your error code is pretty specific, so I am wondering if this was not implemented in HMP 4.1 and perhaps it is in the guide incorrectly, possibly due to a copy/paste error.  I suggest using dx_reciottdata() instead -- that function is always included in all releases. If you get the same error, then there is likely a problem with the code ... If the error goes away then it appears to be an error in the doc (as the fucntion would not be supported).

Good luck!

  • | Post Points: 5
Page 1 of 1 (2 items) | RSS